The Butterfly Gives Darwin An "Absolute Breakdown"

As stated in a previous post, the academic and scientific communites have major problems. "How are they going to tell the truth, after so many years of misinformation, half-truths and outright lies.

The universe is not billions of years old and the gradual evolutionary development of life on planet earth is a myth. [See "The Theory of Evolution - The Scourge of the Modern World"]

Darwin's "Theory of Evolution" is an absolute lie. Nothing illustrates the madness of nerds, geeks and pseudo-intellectuals more than the lowly butterfly. I hope you enjoy reading the following excerpts from Thomas Heinze's, "Butterfly Gives Darwin an 'Absolute Breakdown', as much as I enjoyed finding it in "Battle Cry" - July/August 2007 - Page 3. The article begins by stating....

"Darwin felt that natural selection, working by just slight modifications, had formed all the animals and all of their organs. He wrote: "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely breakdown." {End Quote}

"Here's an "absolute breakdown" surprise for him! Butterflies are not transformed by successive slight modifications from caterpillars, or from any evolutionary ancestor. Neither are any of their complex organs. When a butterfly egg hatches, a caterpillar steps out, eats, grows, and then builds a little house around itself where it passes into the pupal stage."

"Inside the leather-like shell of the pupa, or larva, the caterpillar dissolves. I don't mean he dissolves in tears, or has a squishy feeling. His eyes, legs, intestines, and bristly fuzz, everything that disguishes him as a caterpillar, melts down to form a thick liquid. Everything except his heart becomes homogenized goo."

"Darwin said that if any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, his theory would absolutely breakdown. Compare organs that crawled in to become the pupa with those of the butterfly that flew out in the chart below."

Caterpillar Organs: Butterfly Organs: 12 legs 13-segment body 6 simple eyes No sex Organs Chewing jaws 0 wings 6 legs 10-segment body 2 compound, 2 simple eyes Sex Organs Coiled sucking tube 2 pairs of wings

"All these butterfly organs formed from goo! None formed from slight modifications to previous organs! Darwin struck out. Darwin thought that natural selection had lifted all plants and animals up from a single cell by eliminating the less fit and keeping the more fit alive. What is the least fit substance you can think of? Thick liquid?"

"Well even if you can think of something less fit than thick liquid, you know that liquid goo has no selective advantage over a varacious caterpillar crawling efficiently through the brush, avoiding predators with protective coloration and covering of disgusting thick fuzz! Darwin was right! His theory absolutely breaks down, crushed under the weight of one of God's lightest creatures: the butterfly!"

In author Thomas Heinze's books, The Vanishing Proofs of Evolution, In the Beginning-Soup? and How Life Began, you will find other examples of evolution's breakdowns. Evolution is not science or scientific, it is nothing more than a strong delusion.

A Hell Of An Answer

The following is an actual question given on a University of Liverpool chemistry final exam.

The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues via the Internet, which is why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.

Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law that gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed or some variant.

One student, however, wrote the following:

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that, if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell.

Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell. Because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay constant, the volume of Hell must expand proportionately as souls are added. This gives two possibilities:


1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.

2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.


So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Sandra during my freshman year, that "it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number 2 must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is endothermic and has already frozen over.

The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is extinct ... leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being – which explains why, last night, Sandra kept shouting "Oh my God."


THIS STUDENT RECEIVED THE ONLY "A".

Discovered at Is God Religious

Bubblized - The New Madness

What is "Bubblized"? Bubblized is mental condition that comes from spending too much time around people like yourself. Bubblization is an affliction that gradually destroys a person's ability to do indepth common sense reasoning.

Bubblized is a dangerous malady that afflicts the vast majority of people in upper level management within the world's governments, educational institutions, churches, brokerage houses, banks and industries.

The most blatant example of "Bubblization" is our local, state and national political leaders; especially those in Washington DC. Currently, our worthless politicians are going to rebate back to tax payers 150 billion dollars in a so-called "Economic Stimulus Package" that is supposed to avert a recession.

Nothing is more frustrating, maddening and embarrassing than to see our government trying to deal with a problem they have created by their shortsighted thinking, planning and policy implementations. Since a huge number of products sold in America is manufactured in China, how can we stimulate our economy by giving most of the 150 billion dollars back to the Chinese?